The collapsing US military & economic empire is making Washington & NATO even more dangerous. US could not beat the Taliban but thinks it can take on China-Russia-Iran...a sign of psychopathology for sure.
”Black” (“黒”): A pair of astronauts trapped on orbital space station because of nuclear war that ran very fast on the earth below. They lost contact with earth, all attempts to make connection with base or with anybody failed without answer.
Congresswoman Accuses Trump of Shielding Al-Qaeda in Idlib
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (HI-02) called out President Donald Trump and Vice President Pence for allegedly protecting al-Qaeda in Idlib, Syria, while speaking in the House on September 13.
"Two days ago, President Trump and Vice President Pence delivered solemn speeches about the attacks on 9/11, talking about how much they care about the victims of al-Qaeda's attack on our country. But, they are now standing up to protect the 20,000 to 40,000 al-Qaeda and other jihadist forces in Syria, and threatening Russia, Syria, and Iran, with military force if they dare attack these terrorists," the congresswoman stressed.
Gabbard qualified the Trump administration's handling of the Idlib
problem as nothing short of "betrayal of the American people" and most
notably, "the victims of al-Qaeda's attack on 9/11 and their families."
In 1983, President Ronald Reagan proposed a military system, later dubbed “Star Wars,” that promised to protect the United States from nuclear attack. The basic idea was to use weapons based in space to knock down incoming intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs).
Reagan’s plan didn’t materialize, but the idea never went away. In 2018—against the Department of Defense’s wishes—Congress passed a bill calling for the Pentagon to start building space-based interceptors.
Unfortunately, it’s a terrible plan. Space-based missile defense is an ineffectual defense at best, and a very dangerous provocation at worst.
Understanding why space-based missile defense is a bad idea requires basic knowledge of how it works—and what it can and can’t do.
History lesson: Operation Mockingbird - CIA's media control
Jesse Ventura and Brigida Santos discuss Operation Mockingbird and how
America’s most powerful news outlets worked with the CIA for 25 years to
plant false stories and mislead the public.
Documentarian John Barbour
talks about the surveillance of journalists.
The Church Committee was the Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, a U.S. Senate committee chaired by Idaho Senator Frank Church (D-ID) in 1975. The committee investigated abuses by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The committee was part of a series of investigations into intelligence abuses in 1975, dubbed the "Year of Intelligence".
By the early years of the 1970s, a series of troubling revelations had appeared in the press concerning intelligence activities. First came the revelations by Army intelligence officer Christopher Pyle in January 1970 of the U.S. Army's spying on the civilian population and Senator Sam Ervin's Senate investigations produced more revelations. Then on December 22, 1974, The New York Times published a lengthy article by Seymour Hersh detailing operations engaged in by the CIA over the years that had been dubbed the "family jewels". Covert action programs involving assassination attempts on foreign leaders and covert attempts to subvert foreign governments were reported for the first time. In addition, the article discussed efforts by intelligence agencies to collect information on the political activities of US citizens.
The creation of the Church Committee was approved on January 27, 1975, by a vote of 82 to 4 in the Senate.
Sadly despite that good start the CIA and other intelligence agencies have retaken control and now are freely running their own foreign policy (that benefits corporate interests) without any real Congressional or public oversight and restrictions.
Dr. William F. Pepper, who became James Earl Ray’s attorney after meeting with him in prison in the late 1970s and later went on to represent the King family in a civil suit and write the definitive book on the case, The Plot to Kill King. He is featured in this video.
WILLIAM PEPPER: Well, I was a journalist in Vietnam, and I did an article for Ramparts magazine—which was a progressive magazine at the time—and Martin King was a subscriber to the magazine. And when I came back from Vietnam, I did an article called “The Children of Vietnam,” which described the war crimes that America was committing in that country and the horrific loss of life, and particularly the effect on the children.
So Martin was on his way to the Caribbean on a holiday, and he was stopped at the Atlanta Airport from where he was flying. And he started going through his mail and there was Ramparts from January of ’67. And he didn’t read the article, but he opened it. He opened it, and he started to look at the photographs which I had taken. I kept all the photographs to myself when I was in the country and I also did not do anything with the recordings I made. So he looked at the photographs of the wounded and maimed and dead civilians, particularly children. And Bernard Lee, his bodyguard, had gone up to get something to eat and came back with some food, and he put it on the table and Martin just pushed it away and said, “I don’t think I’m ever going to enjoy a meal again until we end this wretched war.” And that was his introduction to my work.
Anyway, then when he came back from his trip in the Caribbean he asked to meet with me, and we met. And during the last year of his life we were quite close and we strategized a lot about how to change things in America. And that was the birth of the idea that he had had about a poor people’s march in Washington. So I came close to him during that last year.
I spoke on April 15th [1967] to a large rally in front of the UN and suggested to that crowd that there be a third party led by Martin Luther King and Benjamin Spock, and the crowd obviously rose in acceptance. And when Martin came up to speak he indicated that if he did such a thing it would really only be for the purpose of highlighting the horror of the war and ending it. And he delivered a speech at the Riverside Church on April 4, 1967, a year to the day before he was assassinated. And there was a powerful anti-war speech that he delivered. So he was very much in the fold then.
And I met him for the first time in—I guess it was late January or February when we met at Brown University where he delivered a speech, and I was to meet him there. And we were to go together to Harvard where we opened [the volunteer project] “Vietnam Summer.” And I showed him in that trip all of the files that I had readily available and he wept. He openly wept. He was a man of great compassion and feeling, and he knew that he had to do something about this war.
A small tv crew asked Afghan locals why the US is fighting in their country. The Afghan locals have no clue what 9/11 is.
The Afghan locals then asked US Marine Corps officers, "What is the relation of 9/11 to Afghanistan?"
The US military officers give the wrong answer. The officers don't even
know who was actually behind 9/11. Don't believe me, watch it. It's all
on film here!
A Democratic political action committee (PAC) dropped six figures on two ads against 30-year incumbent Congressman Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) ahead of California’s election on November 6. The ads are mock endorsements from the Russian Federation of the candidate.
The PAC — Red to Blue — aims to flip the district, one of just seven
of California's 53 districts with Republican representation.
Rohrabacher's Democratic opponent, Harley Rouda, was a Republican and
donated to a Republican candidate in the 2016 election. He's also a real
estate executive "opposed to rent control," according to the New York
Times.
On Monday, a poll by the NYT and Siena College found that Rouda and
Rohrabacher are tied at 45 percent support from likely voters.
"There are many better things to attack Rohrabacher on, for instance his
opposition to public healthcare, his denial of climate change and his
strong opposition to basic LGBT rights," MacLeod told Sputnik News.
"These issues would be sure to resonate with their base and the general
public, but the fact that the party managers are ignoring them in favour
of Russia-baiting is a sign of how insular and out of touch they are."
Many soldiers and sailors (Army and Navy) were used as guinea pigs by the US military during atomic tests.
In many cases the US ran a series of medical evaluations on these witnesses of the nuclear explosions to determine the effects of the radioactive contamination they received by being present during the tests.
In 1997 the Florida Coalition for Peace & Justice held a protest at the Kennedy Space Center just prior to the Cassini plutonium launch. An older man approached me before we began the event and asked if he could speak. He said he wanted to tell his story about being an atomic veteran and how we should not trust NASA's claims that launching nuclear power was safe.
During the rally the man explained to us that he was dying of cancer. He has been in the Army and his unit was parachuted into the mushroom cloud during an atomic bomb test in New Mexico in 1945. He explained that after they hit the ground they were immediately examined by medical doctors who took their blood, temperature, pulse rate and other such tests. Then they were placed on a train which stopped at various locations where these same tests were run again. It was not until years later that they realized that each of the train stops was at a Department of Energy laboratory site - places like Oak Ridge in Tennessee, Savannah River Plant in South Carolina and others including Hannaford site in Washington state.
The soldiers figured out that they were being used as guinea pigs. He told us he was the last one in his unit still alive and that his only child also was suffering from cancer.
What kind of a sick society would do this kind of thing to their own countrymen and allies? It was clear that the US only saw these GI's as disposable. No one in the government has ever been held accountable for these crimes.
Here is my full talk (less than 6 minutes) at the Rise for climate event in Portland, Maine last Saturday. We had a 'peace hub' at the march gathering site before events began and were able to bring the story of the Pentagon's #1 carbon boot print to folks who know little to nothing about this particular reality.
You can see another video with our other speakers during the peace hub here. They also addressed the military link to climate change.
Thanks to Martha Spiess for the videos and for organizing the hub along with Lisa Savage..
