Saturday, September 19, 2026

Friday, September 18, 2026

Latest updates from a wobbly Earth

  • In an earthquake vote on Capitol Hill, the House just ordered the withdrawal of all American troops from Iran. Seven Republicans broke party lines to join every Democrat, dealing a STUNNING blow to military leadership. Washington is officially in CRISIS over this war. Is this a long-overdue EXIT or a dangerous retreat that invites chaos? 
  • Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov: ‘Gulf states and Iran agree to meet in one of the cities of Oman, but it was delayed — someone doesn’t want the region to normalize, wants to provoke conflicts and differences between countries.’
  • Iran’s IRGC has shot down its 52nd American MQ-9 drone above Qeshm Island, southern Iran.  

  • Portugal’s Foreign Minister Paulo Rangel stated that Jewish settlement expansion and economic pressure in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem were weakening prospects for establishing a viable Palestinian state. Rangel said Israel’s E1 settlement plan was "extremely pernicious" because it would split the occupied West Bank, separate East Jerusalem and undermine the possibility of a 'two-state solution.' He also described Israel’s withholding of Palestinian tax revenues as a "brutal strangulation" of the Palestinian Authority’s finances, saying the measures were preventing the Palestinian economy from operating. 
  • Israeli reconnaissance drone activity surging across Lebanon, observed extensively over south Lebanon and Beirut's southern suburb. Israeli attacks on Lebanon have killed almost 9,000 people since the initial aggression began in October 2023.
  • Palestinians mobilize to defend Majd al-Krum as Smotrich vows to expand Jewish settlements in occupied Galilee. Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich escalated tensions by declaring that the settlement "revolution" in the occupied West Bank would be extended to the Galilee and the Naqab (Negev), after his Religious Zionism party attacked what it called a "loss of control" in the Galilee over pro-Palestine chants during protests. Medical Aid for Palestinians says ‘no aid’ is entering the strip, causing severe shortages at the Al-Shifa Hospital that faced numerous Israeli raid and strikes throughout the genocide. 

  • The Cradle: Israeli military Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir seeks 'legal action' against filmmakers behind NAZA documentary. The film “adopts narratives of Israel’s haters, defames our soldiers and commanders, and seeks to portray the IDF as deliberately acting unlawfully,” he said.  The film includes testimonies from Israeli soldiers describing the Gaza genocide as ‘insanely fun’. Israel’s Culture Minister Miki Zohar said he would work to revoke the citizenship of Oscar-winning filmmakers Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor after their documentary NAZA won the Special Jury Prize at the Venice Film Festival. 
  • So we are supposed to believe an American pilot flying bombing missions over Iran had his plane shot down and 'hit the ground at 70–100 mph, broke his back, arm, and shoulder, then somehow climbed a 7,000-foot ridgeline to evade capture?' [Expect the Hollywood movie next. This is the kind of story you put out when you are losing a war.]

  • Columbia University paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to pro-Israel organizations during a period of intensified repression of pro-Palestine student activism, reports The Intercept. Financial filings show the university paid $100,000 to the Israel on Campus Coalition and $75,000 to the American Israel Education Foundation, AIPAC’s charitable arm, during 2024. The university also paid $450,000 to the United Jewish Appeal Federation of New York that year. Over the past decade, Columbia paid $250,000 to AIPAC’s charitable arm, while it paid $7,200 to the Anti-Defamation League in 2025 for what it described as “program services.” The payments coincided with Columbia suspending Jewish Voice for Peace and Students for Justice in Palestine, calling police to arrest pro-Palestine protesters, and dismantling solidarity encampments. 

  • Nat'l Call for Safe Tech: Congress is fast-tracking two bills (HR 8255 and S.3639) to launch of hundreds of thousands of satellites. These bills would accelerate satellite deployments in already crowded orbits.  Applications for a million orbital data centers have already been submitted to the FCC. The FCC has NEVER assessed the health or environmental impacts of satellites, and the GAO has already found that this outdated approach needs to be reexamined.  These bills would further incentivize the FCC to continue to ignore otherwise legally required analysis and public involvement on environmental and human health impacts.
  • Antiwar.com: US Africa Command announced that its forces launched another airstrike in Somalia as the Trump administration continues a record-breaking bombing campaign in the country, which receives virtually no coverage in US media. AFRICOM said they targeted al-Shabaab in the vicinity of Quumbi, a village about 50 miles northeast of the southern port city of Kismayo. As usual, AFRICOM offered no other details about the strike, and there were no statements from US-backed forces about military operations in the area that day.  According to AFRICOM’s numbers, the attack brings the total number of US airstrikes in Somalia this year to 81.
  • Israeli 'defense' technology company Capture Systems Ltd. plans to establish its US headquarters in Sterling Heights, Michigan, with nearly $1 million in state incentives and an expected 125 new jobs. The Michigan Economic Development Corporation approved the incentives for the company’s US expansion. The new facility is expected to manufacture counter-drone platforms, optical surveillance equipment and mobile defense systems, while also testing advanced counter-drone technology and remotely operated weapons systems. The expansion comes as Michigan seeks to strengthen its role in drone and defense technology, with Camp Grayling in northern Michigan also designated by the US government as a testing site for drone research.
  • Sovereignista: Economics Prof. Michael Hudson holds the idea that the ‘pesky middle countries’ must repudiate or default or suspend payments on IMF debt. He explains that incoming world depression from soaring oil prices will strain the balance of payments and they simply cannot afford to pay BOTH the higher oil prices and food import prices AND pay their dollarized debts.
  • CBS has obtained new images of the damages to US facilities at Prince Sultan Air Base, Camp Arifjan & Camp Buehring due to Iranian missile attacks. 

  • Space News: Air Force Secretary Troy Meink revealed that the US has deployed space-control weapons in orbit, while also disclosing new milestones for military satellite programs tied to missile defense and long-range targeting. Meink says Space Force will begin launching air-target tracking satellites this month and has reached flight-ready hardware on a Golden Dome interceptor effort. “This is why the Space Force now has on-orbit space control weapons capable of defending the joint force against hostile adversary action,” he said. “It is critically important that we maintain our dominance, not only in the air but in space,” he said. [Trump's Space Force knows that the Golden Dome costs in the trillions is problematic for the nation, already strapped with $40 trillion debt. So they are rushing some kind of 'space weapons deployment' in order to make it harder to stop the program.]
  • The Yemeni Armed Forces show they shot down a Saudi F-15 fighter jet during their current offensive. 

  • Pepe Escobar, The Global South Is Building a World Beyond US Control: Yemen’s advance and the shutdown of Saudi Arabia’s East–West pipeline have raised the stakes around the Red Sea and Hormuz. Meanwhile, BRICS has issued its strongest condemnation yet of secondary sanctions and is expanding trade in national currencies. Russia and Iran are coordinating more closely, BRICS Pay is moving forward, and China is pressing for deeper financial, industrial and digital ties across the bloc. Each new route and payment mechanism leaves the Global South less exposed to US sanctions and financial pressure.
  • Russian strikes targeting the De Novo data center in Kiev will create “an information vacuum and eliminate databases used to target our facilities – including those deep inside Russian territory,” Col. (ret.) Anatoliy Matviychuk told Sputnik. Besides being used to store “vast amounts of intelligence data to support the operations of Ukraine’s military” and drawn upon by Palantir, the massive data center served several other functions, including waging “information-psychological warfare on the Russian population” using local platforms.
  • K. J. Noh: President Lee Jae Myung has announced he will not be sending South Korean (ROK) troops to Iran.  He is the first Korean president to refuse to send ROK troops to an illegal US war (they are all illegal). Prior to this, ROK sent troops to every US major war since 1950. It has had secret deployments with almost every US operation, and it has had Special Warfare forces in UAE since 2011. This refusal is a historic first. However, by taking this stand, he has put himself in US crosshairs.  The US is unlikely to give up its pressure. In fact, it could retaliate, including staging a coup. There is already a coup US Ambassador in place, Michelle Steele.

  • Exxon Mobil has shut down one of the largest diesel refineries in the US. The refinery produced 11 million gallons of gasoline and diesel fuel per day.
  • Northern Siberia’s oil reserves, which Russia is developing and shipping via the Arctic Ocean, could give Moscow a major geopolitical advantage.  By linking Siberian production to Arctic sea routes, Russia is building a new energy corridor aimed at Asian markets, thereby expanding its export options beyond traditional routes. The first crude shipments have already departed. Situated on the Taymyr Peninsula, Vostok Oil combines the existing Vankor fields with new deposits in the northern Krasnoyarsk Krai, drawing on a resource base estimated at around 7 billion tons of liquid hydrocarbons.

Report from Finland: Impacts since joining NATO in 2023

 

From September the 'Defence Cooperation Agreement' (DCA)  with USA is valid. Here in the North of Finland, the USA has got two places for restoring of weapons and materials (Kemi and Tervola), one airport (Rovaniemi) one garnizone (Sodankylä) and one frontier guard in Ivalo – right in the North-East of Lapland near the Russian Border. The distance between Murmansk and Ivalo is less than 300 kms.

The spirit in Finland is depressive, since we joined NATO and since our parliament approved the DCA. The people was never asked – joining the NATO was made on false polls. For many reasons we are told lies all the time. Russia has repeatedly said that they do not plan to attack Finland, but still we are fed up with stories of 'the Russian threats'. The private discussions get more and more important to keep us in the reality.

These decisions become very expensive for the population. The social and health care are cut and diminished. The roads which have been neglected for years are now suddenly prepared for NATO´s needs. The railway infrastructure is planned to be changed in order to fit the width of the West-European rails, which is a little more narrow than the Finnish railway, which was built from 1862 on, during the Russian era (1809 – 1917). 

This is a shame because we have a population getting old, needing care, and our children need education and support as well. The regime talks like our security is depending on violence and weapons – even nuclear – instead of human understanding, diplomacy and cooperation.

This map is before Finland joined NATO in 2023

If we are sincere, we cannot say that this change of strategy is due to Russian aggression. Russia did make diplomatic efforts to try to get negotiations about European security before the war in Ukraine. Ever since the coup in Kiev 2014, Russia tried eagerly to get diplomatic solutions to the situation, that was very dangerous for Russian speakers [in the Donbass of eastern Ukraine], other minorities for some political parties and so on.

I live in Lapland about 100 kms north from the Arctic circle. I enjoy the life here with friendly neighbors, with the nature round the corner and rather cool weather as well. Sometimes it is hard when the cold and darkness is strong. Last winter we had for a couple of weeks of 40 degrees Celsius and a long time -30 degrees. But because it is hard, people help each other despite of differences in political or other opinions.

The reindeers are around and need good surroundings. When they are making the infrastructure for NATO – they neglect the needs of the reindeer herders. For instance they plan to build new roads for strategic reasons right through the areas where the reindeers need space and peace for living.

Before, when our politicians had diplomatic relations as the key for our security, we could cooperate with all our neighbors in a peaceful way with the benefits of all. If the NATO occupies Lapland like Hitler´s Germany did 1941, the living here is getting restricted and difficult.

The nature needs peace and so do we human beings also.

Greetings to all our friends around the world!

Kerstin Tuomala, Finland 

War machine is an Earth killer


Watch Abby Martin's much needed and amazing new film "Earth's Greatest Enemy" at:

http://www.earthsgreatestenemy.com

Thursday, September 17, 2026

Dear Ed Sheeran...from Candace Owens


Candace Owens likes Ed Sheeran — but says this is the moment that will test him. 

After Macklemore was removed from the tour following his pro-Palestine remarks, Candace calls on Ed to stop hiding behind the stadiums, cancel the remaining shows, and prove that money and industry pressure don’t get the final say.

Importance of 'Keep Space for Peace Week'


Keep Space for Peace Week is organized each year by the Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space.

This year space week will be held October 3-10. During that time we ask groups and concerned citizens of the global community to organize events and share information about the growing dangers of the US program to 'control and dominate space and to deny others the use of space'. This was all spelled out in the US Space Command document called Vision for 2020.

Various activities could be held during the week. Educational forums, protest events outside military bases, military weapons production sites, various government installations and along busy streets.

The public must be informed about the growing costs of preparation for war in space that would result in the theft of taxpayer monies (trillions of dollars) that could otherwise be used for health care, education, environmental care, public transportation, infrastructure repair and more.

Many nations are now falling into the trap of investing in this 'pie in the sky' dream of mining the sky for precious resource extraction on the planetary bodies. Elon Musk wants to mine Mars for magnesium, cobalt, uranium and other minerals. On the Moon there is helium-3 and water that attracts many greedy 'investors'. Gold is promised on the asteroids.

With each polluting rocket launch a larger hole is punched in the Earth's ozone layer that keeps life on our fragile planet from burning up. Also Lower Earth Orbit (LEO) is now getting so crowded with satellites that scientists fear cascading collisions (called the Kessler Syndrome) will occur making it virtually impossible to get a rocket off our planet thru that space mine field.

There are many reasons to oppose the nuclearization and weaponization of space. Please go to our two video libraries here and here and help spread these various space-related videos during space week.

Thanks for your interest and concern. Please contact us with any questions or suggestions at globalnet@mindspring.com

Bruce


Wednesday, September 16, 2026

A look back: Space Weapons Media Briefing Trip


I wrote this article for the blog on May 18, 2005. It covers an important space issues meeting with media and 'tech experts' which I attended and wanted to re-share. (Art work by my now passed-away dear Florida friend and long-time collaborator Bill Park.)

I have just returned from a two-day trip to northern Virginia where I attended, along with Global Network board member Loring Wirbel from Colorado Springs, an event organized by Dr. Helen Caldicott called Full Spectrum Dominance.

Helen's Nuclear Policy Research Institute gathered key media representatives from news outlets like CNN, NBC, Space News, Reuters, Financial Times, San Francisco Chronicle, Defense Daily, Washington Post, Cape Cod Times, Toronto Globe & Mail, UPI and others, to hear the two-day briefing from scientists, policy makers, space strategists and activists. The event took place at a conference center in a beautiful rural setting where 25 briefers sat down with the 45 members of the media to discuss the latest developments in military space issues.

The event began with Gen. Charles Horner, retired former commander of the U.S. Space Command. He described his career as one of "destroying things and killing people" and told the assembled that the Pentagon does not "want to talk about space control because they are afraid of groups like you that will be protesting in the streets." He went on to defend plans for missile defense by saying that "ones [nukes] that we shoot down are going to fall on Canada" rather than the U.S.

Since World War II over $130 billion has been wasted on research and development (R & D) for the Star Wars program. The Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency (MDA) is now spending about $10 billion a year on space weapons R & D. The George W. Bush administration is expected to announce its new national space policy sometime in June and the New York Times reported on May 18 that the new directive will likely include language giving the Pentagon the green light to move forward with offensive technologies for military space control and domination.

Dr. Richard Garwin, Senior Fellow for Science and Technology at the Council on Foreign Relations, talked about the benefits of U.S. military control of space and said "It would be a disaster for U.S. military capability to lose our current military space resources." It was commonly agreed that the U.S. today has sole military control of space and that current Pentagon military satellites give the U.S. military the ability to wage war onto the Earth with unrivaled power. Peter Hayes, former Air Force officer, reported that nearly 70% of the weapons used in the recent U.S. "shock and awe" invasion of Iraq were guided to their targets by space satellites. Thus, he maintained, the U.S. must control the space medium.

As the public becomes more aware of U.S. plans for space dominance, the military seeks to water down some of its previously provocative language. One example is replacing the word "deployment" with the phrase "test-bedding" when describing new space weapons technologies. This will make it harder for Congress to vote against a particular program because it is sold as a benign R & D effort.

Even some people that you would consider "peace activists" support the notion of U.S. space control. Mike Moore, former Editor of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, stated he was "in favor of full spectrum dominance," but urged the U.S. not to reject the notion of treaties that could bring stability to space. Moore, and others from traditional "arms control" organizations, argued that using weapons in space would create larger space debris problems for the Pentagon, thus putting existing U.S. military space assets in jeopardy. One representative of an arms control group seemed to imply that using "reversible" anti-satellite weapons (that only temporarily blind an opponent's satellite) might be more acceptable as they leave an attacked satellite intact but inoperable, thus eliminating the debris problem.

Much time was spent debating the merits of missile defense. Will it work or not? Can a bullet hit a bullet in space or is the technology incapable of ever working? Ted Postol, Professor of Science, Technology, and National Security at MIT offered strong evidence that the missile defense "kill vehicle" could never discriminate effectively between actual warheads and dummies thus enabling any attacking nation the ability to overwhelm the system. During one back-and-forth debate on this issue (what I call "inside baseball") several arms control advocates responded to a question from missile defense proponents saying they would support the program if indeed it would work.

One program offered by many as an alternative to an unworkable national missile defense system (whose job would be to protect the continental U.S. from attack) is to build a Theatre Missile Defense (TMD), or boost-phase defense system that would have a "better chance" of performing the desired result of destroying a launched "enemy" missile. This could be done by deploying TMD systems near North Korea (who today has zero nuclear weapons capable of hitting the North American continent) and "taking out" their missiles soon after launch. Dr. Hui Zhang, a Chinese scientist now studying at Harvard University, reminded the audience that China views TMD systems as highly destabilizing and believes they are intended to negate China's current deterrent stock of 20 nuclear missiles. TMD deployments by the U.S., on Aegis destroyers, are planned in Japan, South Korea and possibly Taiwan. China has responded that TMD deployments, as well as other U.S. moves to "deny" space access to potential enemies, could force them to build more nuclear missiles.

Dr. Everrett Dolman, Professor of Military Studies at the Air Force School of Advanced Air and Space Studies at Maxwell AFB in Alabama, emphatically stated that the U.S. "will not give up its right to use force as long as it is the hegemon." Formerly on active duty in the Air Force, Dolman began his career as an intelligence analyst for the National Security Agency, and later moved to the U.S. Space Command. At one point, during a discussion about the need for a new international space treaty to prevent an arms race in space, Dolman responded derisively, "Mice always vote to bell the cat."

One of the "mice" in the meeting was Vladimir Yermakov, Senior Councellor at the Russian Embassy in Washington. (He was closely watched by an FBI agent who monitored every move he made while he was at the event.) Yermakov stated that Russia has sworn off first-deployment of weapons in space. In reference to Russia's strong support for a new, expansive space weapons treaty he said, "We fail to understand the position of the U.S. in this matter. We ask what is wrong with our approach and get no answer." He refers to the U.S. refusal to negotiate a new space treaty. The official position of the U.S., during both the Clinton and Bush administrations, has been that there is no problem and thus no need for a new treaty banning weapons in space.

On the second day of the event Loring Wirbel and I had a chance to make presentations to the assembly. Loring went first and did a fabulous job of describing how space technology today is used to coordinate virtually all warfare on Earth. He began by challenging the tendency of some "arms control groups" to offer compromises on the space weapons issue, stating they needed to strengthen themselves by developing some "outside the beltway thinking." (Loring is a long-time member of the Colorado Springs-based group Citizens for Peace in Space that was a founding member of the Global Network. He makes his living as an editorial director of a high-tech magazine and is an effective spokesman for the peace movement position that allowing a "little bit" of space weaponization will lead to more and more of it over time, thus creating the eventual spark for a dangerous new arms race.) Loring estimated that about $70 billion a year is spent on "military space" development once you factor in the combined space budgets of the MDA, the National Reconnaissance Office, the National Security Administration, NASA, and the Department of Energy (now developing the nuclear rocket).

I began my presentation by referring to the heated debate over the question whether missile defense will work or not. I proposed to widen the discussion and suggested we look at Christopher Columbus and Spain. I reminded everyone how Queen Isabella began the 100-year process of building the Spanish Armada after Columbus' "successful" return voyage from the Americas. Spain's naval armada helped create the global war system that we suffer from today, as soon thereafter all the European powers were building navies to "compete" for control and domination of the sea lanes and new territories for resources and markets. I suggested we were now debating the size of the cannon balls on Spanish armada ships rather than discussing the long-term implications of creating a new arms race in the heavens. I talked about the long-range plan of the space command to build a military highway from the Earth out to the planetary bodies and showed the cover of the congressional study called Military Space Forces: The Next 50 Years

I suggested that "missile defense" was a Trojan horse that really didn't have to work -- it had already allowed the Pentagon and the aerospace industry to move tens of billions of dollars into research and development programs for space offensive warfare -- all the while hyping up North Korea's "puny" missile capability. 

I talked about the mission of the Global Network to create an international citizens constituency to stop an arms race in space, and detailed the efforts of our affiliated groups across the U.S. and around the world. I shared how TMD deeply concerns our members in Japan and South Korea because they understand how this program will be a provocation to China and destabilize the Asian-Pacific region. Could it be, I asked, this is what the weapons industry really wants? A new arms race partner in China?


I concluded with several solutions. I suggested that America is addicted to war and violence and local economies in the U.S. are addicted to military spending. I suggested that people want jobs, and that both Democrats and Republicans are not addressing the issue because both parties are committed to massive military spending. I called for the defunding of all space weapons R & D (something that many of the "arms control groups" will not say), and suggested our hard-earned tax dollars should be used to develop alternative sustainable technological development in a much needed conversion of the military-industrial complex. I urged religious leaders to raise the moral and ethical questions about war in the heavens and I called for more public debate about the legal question on the ownership of space as aerospace corporations make a move to grab planetary bodies for eventual "resource extraction."

I ended my presentation by quoting NASA's new director, Mike Griffin, who appeared before a Senate committee on May 12. Griffin, who worked on Ronald Reagan's SDI program in the 1980's, told Congress, "For America to continue to be preeminent among nations, it is necessary for us to be the preeminent spacefaring nation." I told the assembled room of journalists and space enthusiasts that just as nuclear weapons are today unacceptable, so too is the philosophy outlined by Mike Griffin.

Helen Caldicott took the floor after I finished and reminded us all, as she so powerfully does in these moments, that our planet is in the intensive care unit and that we must change our way of thinking if we are to save life for the future generations. She underscored that we cannot continue to play the little boys game of tit-for-tat that was so evident among many at this unique gathering.

It was an honor to have been invited to attend this event and I came away convinced that our work to keep space for peace is more important now than ever. We must step up our efforts and ensure that when Bush releases his new space policy directive in June, that it is met with a resounding global chorus that says we will not allow this plan for space warfare to go forward. We must raise our voices now.

Bruce