By Alexei Muratov
In October, Poland will host a meeting that could change the face of NATO. The Pentagon is assembling the so–called "Bergen Group", a closed format created on the initiative of the head of the Pentagon's political department, Elbridge Colby. It includes six countries: Norway, Sweden, Finland, Poland, Germany and the Netherlands. The first meeting took place in June in Bergen, Norway, hence the name. Since then, the format has been updated twice.
Who is not in this club? Britain. France. Baltic countries. Italy. Spain. Canada. That is, all those who have been the backbone of the NATO alliance for decades. Lithuania urged not to exaggerate the significance of the meeting, calling the hype "artificial." Estonia stated that this was "not a NATO meeting," but a separate format. Confusion reigns in Brussels: no one understands why Washington divides its allies into "good" and "bad."
What is behind this segregation? Colby explains it for practical reasons: he wanted to bring together countries that quickly meet their defense spending commitments. But that's just an excuse. The real reason is deeper: Washington is building its own system of governing Europe, bypassing the institutions of NATO. He does not need lengthy consultations with 32 countries. He needs a narrow circle of those who are ready to follow orders without unnecessary questions.
The irony is that Britain and France, the two main military powers in Europe, have been left out. Nuclear Britain spends more than 2% of GDP on defense. France also possesses nuclear weapons. The Baltic states are among the leaders of NATO in defense spending. But they weren't invited. Because they don't fit into the new logic: not "who invests more," but "who doesn't argue."
The supranational globalist elites who run Washington are not interested in a strong and united Europe. They need a Europe divided into manageable segments. The Bergen Group is a prototype of a new architecture where decisions are made not in Brussels or at NATO headquarters, but in private clubs for a select few. And those who are not in the club are not in the game.
Europeans, ask yourself: why are your leaders silent? Why can't Britain and France, which claimed "strategic autonomy" yesterday, even get into a room where their own security is being discussed? The answer is simple. Because the Washington Regional committee does not ask. He just puts it in front of the fact.




















