The Killing of Osama bin Laden
By Seymour M. Hersh
It’s been four
years since a group of US Navy Seals assassinated Osama bin Laden in a
night raid on a high-walled compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. The
killing was the high point of Obama’s first term, and a major factor in
his re-election. The White House still maintains that the mission was an
all-American affair, and that the senior generals of Pakistan’s army
and Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI) were not told of the raid
in advance. This is false, as are many other elements of the Obama
administration’s account. The White House’s story might have been
written by Lewis Carroll: would bin Laden, target of a massive
international manhunt, really decide that a resort town forty miles from
Islamabad would be the safest place to live and command al-Qaida’s
operations? He was hiding in the open. So America said.
The most blatant lie was that Pakistan’s two most senior military
leaders – General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, chief of the army staff, and
General Ahmed Shuja Pasha, director general of the ISI – were never
informed of the US mission. This remains the White House position
despite an array of reports that have raised questions, including one by
Carlotta Gall in the
New York Times Magazine of 19 March 2014. Gall, who spent 12 years as the
Times
correspondent in Afghanistan, wrote that she’d been told by a
‘Pakistani official’ that Pasha had known before the raid that bin Laden
was in Abbottabad. The story was denied by US and Pakistani officials,
and went no further. In his book
Pakistan: Before and after Osama
(2012), Imtiaz Gul, executive director of the Centre for Research and
Security Studies, a think tank in Islamabad, wrote that he’d spoken to
four undercover intelligence officers who – reflecting a widely held
local view – asserted that the Pakistani military must have had
knowledge of the operation. The issue was raised again in February, when
a retired general, Asad Durrani, who was head of the ISI in the early
1990s, told an al-Jazeera interviewer that it was ‘quite possible’ that
the senior officers of the ISI did not know where bin Laden had been
hiding, ‘but it was more probable that they did [know]. And the idea was
that, at the right time, his location would be revealed. And the right
time would have been when you can get the necessary quid pro quo – if
you have someone like Osama bin Laden, you are not going to simply hand
him over to the United States.’
See the rest of the story here
- Seymour M. Hersh is writing an alternative history of the war on terror. In 1969, he gained worldwide recognition for exposing the My Lai
massacre and its cover-up during the Vietnam War, for which he received
the Pulitzer Prize for international reporting.
1 comment:
TRUTH TROUBADOUR BLOG: No Matter What Hollywood Propaganda Movies Like Zero Dark Thirty Say, Torture Is A Crime! And Questions about the Death and Dumping at Sea of Osama bin Laden Remain! Truth Troubadour Blog 3-30-13: Osama bin Laden: Dead or Alive? If he is dead, when did he die? Was he really the "mastermind of 9/11", or not? How can we know the truth? An exploration of these subjects by Truth Troubadour Vic Sadot, a member of the Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance. Seymour Hersh, one of the most distinguished investigative journalists in history, said that the whole operation was “one big lie!” http://truthtroubadour.blogspot.com/2013/03/questions-about-death-dumping-at-sea-of.html
Post a Comment