Organizing Notes

Bruce Gagnon is coordinator of the Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space. He offers his own reflections on organizing and the state of America's declining empire....

My Photo
Name:
Location: Bath, Maine, United States

Saturday, June 04, 2005

BUSH SEEKS MILITARY CONTROL OF SPACE

The Bush administration is expected to soon announce a new national space policy that will give the Pentagon the green light to move toward deployment of offensive weapons in space.

The new directive could allow deployment of lasers in space; attack planes that descend on targets from space; anti-satellite weapons, which would disrupt or destroy other nation's satellites; and tungsten rods fired from space platforms that would gather speeds of over 7,000 mph and be able to penetrate underground targets.

In the Air Force Space Command’s Strategic Master Plan, FY06 and Beyond, the military said, “Our vision calls for prompt global strike space systems with the capability to apply force from or through space against terrestrial targets. International treaties and laws do not prohibit the use or presence of conventional weapons in space.”

There was a treaty that limited the research, development, testing and deployment of such offensive space systems. It was the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty with Russia. Once in office, George W. Bush withdrew the U.S. from the treaty and moved forward with expanded research and development on offensive space weapons.

The 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq was largely coordinated from space. Over 70% of the weapons used in the war were guided to their targets by military satellites. Thus the Pentagon maintains that the U.S. must “deny” other nations the use of space in order to maintain “full spectrum dominance.”

In order to sell this space warfare program to the American people, the Pentagon has labeled it “missile defense.” But in reality the program is all about offensive engagement and was first spelled out in the 1997 Space Command plan, Vision for 2020, that called for U.S. “control and domination” of space.

The Pentagon and its aerospace corporation allies understand that they cannot come to the American people and ask for hundreds of billions of dollars for offensive weapons in space. Thus the claim of “missile defense.” The U.S. has to date spent well over $130 billion on Star Wars research and development. The budget for military-related space activity in 2003 was $18 billion and is expected to top $25 billion a year by 2010.

With growing budget deficits in the U.S., Congress will have to drastically cut needed programs like Medicare, Medicaid, education, public transit, and environmental clean-up in order to pay the growing cost of space weapons technology.

The world has become reliant on satellites for cell phones, cable TV, ATM bank machines and the like. Space debris is already a problem as space shuttles have had windshields cracked by bits of paint orbiting the Earth at enormous speeds. Imagine what would happen if the U.S. began destroying satellites in space, creating massive amounts of orbiting space junk, that made access to space virtually impossible for everyone.

For the last several years the Space Command, headquartered in Colorado Springs, held a computer simulation space war game set in the year 2017. The game pitted the “Blues” (U.S.) against the “Reds” (China). In the war game the U.S. launched a preemptive first strike attack against China using the military space plane (called Global Strike). Armed with a half-ton of precision-guided munitions the space plane would fly down from orbit and strike anywhere in the world in 45 minutes.

It is easy to see why Canada, Russia, and China have repeatedly gone to the United Nations asking the U.S. to join them in negotiating a new global ban on weapons in space. Why not close the door to the barn before the horse gets out? So far the U.S., during both the Clinton and Bush administrations, refuses to even discuss the idea of a new space treaty.

Gen. Lance Lord, head of the Air Force Space Command, recently told Congress, “Space superiority is not our birthright, but it is our destiny.” The idea that the U.S. is destined to rule the Earth and space militarily needs to be seriously debated by the citizens of our nation. Not only is this a provocative and immoral notion, it is also one that will lead to a massive waste of our hard-earned tax dollars and create a dangerous new arms race. Do we really want war in the heavens?

3 Comments:

Anonymous JimO said...

Get a grip and stop TRYING to freak out some other countries into a false-caused 'space arms race'.

See for example:

Msnbc.com (Oberg): A Russian reality check on space weapons

Arms expert takes issue with alarm sounded by Moscow’s defense chief

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8089747/

photo: Russian Maj. Gen. Vladimir Dvorkin says putting weapons in space would be a "new illusory project," downplaying concerns voiced by his country's defense minister.

By James Oberg, NBC News space analyst, Special to MSNBC

Updated: 5:51 p.m. ET June 3, 2005
A renegade Russian arms expert has splashed cold water over his own country’s concerns about potential U.S. space weapons.
Only a day after Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov appeared to threaten a response to any U.S. effort to put weapons in space, Maj. Gen. Vladimir Dvorkin, a senior scientist at the Russian Academy of Sciences’ Center for International Security, told journalists that such a reaction was unnecessary because “in the near future as there are no such projects in the world.”


jim o
www.jamesoberg.com

6/4/05, 12:43 PM  
Anonymous Cecil Trotter said...

You're so right Jim, but you're wasting your time with people like Gagnon as facts that counter his liberal dogma are meaningless. Of course, I'm sure you know this too. ;-)

6/6/05, 10:08 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah, Jim Oberg and Cecil are right. Stop trying to warn other countries (or citizens around the world) about Amercia's plans to weaponize space under the Big Lie called Ballistic Missile Defense.

Telling the truth about America's plans to establish a totalitarian vision of Full Spectrum Dominance which will enable the USA to lauch OFFENSIVE military strikes against other countries (as documented in open source US military documents) is just "liberal dogma."

Worst of all, it might wake up citizens in other countries (or God forbid, the USA itself) and launch a global anti-Star Wars movement--similar to the global anti-war movement that occurred before the invasion of Iraq.

Now, we certainly would not want this, would we?

Take Jim Oberg and BSNBC's advice and go back to sleep.

Nothing to see here. Move along.

6/30/05, 2:10 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home