Questions and edits by Ann Garrison for the
Black Agenda Report
Germany and Norway both pulled out of NATO's latest anti-Russian war games for fear of COVID-19. I interviewed Bruce Gagnon of the Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space for Black Agenda Report. I spoke to Bruce about the NATO
shutdown.
Ann Garrison: Bruce, do those of us who are not fans of US/NATO wars have reason to celebrate?
Bruce Gagnon: I’d not call it a moment to celebrate
under the circumstances. But we should feel good that peace movements
around the world supported this demand to shut down these irresponsible
war games by US/NATO. Now our focus must shift to the Asia-Pacific where
again the US is promoting a huge naval war game called
RIMPAC aimed
at China, North Korea and Russia. NATO is expanding into the
Asia-Pacific region, intending to become a “global alliance” with a
broader interventionist mission. So we all must keep our eyes on that
ball as well.
AG: Do you think it’s likely that Germany and
Norway, and perhaps other NATO nations, will begin to withdraw troops
from various US/NATO interventions inside and outside Europe as well?
BG: Depends on how long the virus pandemic continues
and the resulting level of economic collapse. Interventions cost money
and NATO members are going to be economically hurting by the time this
virus is defeated. So they shouldn’t be in a hurry to intervene
anywhere. Also, the sanctions on Russia have hurt many European
economies; Italy, Germany and France have been the most outspoken
against them. There are many reasons why more and more NATO members are
questioning the value of the “alliance.”
Which countries are assisting others during this pandemic? China,
Cuba, and Russia are all helping other nations from Iran to Italy,
Thailand to Nicaragua. And what is the US doing to help anyone else?
Nothing that I know of, and in fact it's making things worse by
continuing to sanction Iran and Venezuela during the pandemic.
The US is even doing a poor job of helping its own population, which
has become largely superfluous to Mr. Big. And people remember these
kinds of things. Europeans are figuring out that the US is a morally and
spiritually bankrupt nation and that’s no doubt dawning on Americans
who see the scarcity of medical equipment and the abundance of lethal
weapons here.
Hopefully, the COVID-19 crisis will reveal the real threat to
our safety: neoliberal austerity that destroys national health care,
environmental protection, and everything else of real value.
AG: If that happens, isn’t pressure to withdraw US
troops likely to build as well, especially if coronavirus begins to
spread among them? Soldiers generally live and work in close quarters,
as do prisoners, and many prisoners who should have been released a long
time ago are now being released to stop the pandemic inside prison
walls.
This week DefenseOne.com published a
story of
the first case on a US naval ship, in which it said that “the warship’s
leaders ordered dozens of senior enlisted sailors and officers into a
cramped room on the ship to brief them on the crisis and proper social
distancing,” thus demonstrating how hard it may be for the Navy to limit
coronavirus spread aboard its ships.
BG: Yes, good question. Just as various ports of
call turned away holiday cruises because they were laden with the virus,
nations will at some point begin to turn away the hundreds of US
warships transporting the virus. The virus will spread on the more than
800 US bases strategically scattered around the globe, causing worry and
fear in the local communities surrounding them.
None
of this will help the image of the USA, especially if Washington is as
slow to deal with the virus within the US military as it has been all
over the US.
AG: Reading about this I get the idea that the war
games would have proceeded as planned if US commanders had their way. Do
you agree?
BG: If there had been no public outcry, the
Pentagon would likely have tried to macho their way through it for as
long as possible. Fortunately, there was an outcry—not just from the
public—but also from heads of governments like Germany’s. The German
Bundeswehr’s pullout meant a halt to most of the supply line of military
equipment and weapons for the exercises, not only because German troops
would not be involved but also because German roads wouldn’t either.
AG: It’s my impression that Poland, which did not
announce a withdrawal, is currently very right-wing, very anti-Russian,
pro-NATO and pro-US, and that they’ve even complied with Trump’s demand
that they spend at least 2% of their GDP on weapons. Would you guess
that’s why they were willing to stay in DEFENDER Europe 20?
BG: Poland is currently a total lackey of the US.
Their government requested that the Pentagon build a military base
inside Poland and even offered to pay for it. The US has installed a
huge weapons hub there near the Russian border. One key reason for the
war games was to move massive amounts of additional heavy weapons from
the US to Poland for eventual use. Poland has made their people a target
in any hot war between the US/NATO and Russia.
Lately, however, some in
Poland are calling for a better relationship with Moscow. Lech Walesa,
former Polish labor leader, Nobel Prize winner, and the first elected
President of Poland after the fall of the Soviet Union (1990-1995), has
been one such voice reaching out toward Moscow. The power of the US to
control the chessboard in Europe is indeed fading, and even nations like
Poland will eventually have to see the writing on the wall and cut the
umbilical cord with Washington.
AG: I’ve been told that a significant number of
people in Germany do not want to antagonize Russia, but that antagonism
between Germany and Russia is important to power players in the US. What
do you think?
BG: Germany is an interesting case study. After
World War II and Hitler’s defeat, the US’s Operation Paperclip brought
more than 1,600 German scientists, engineers, and technicians, such as
Wernher von Braun and his V-2 rocket team, to the US. One of the Nazis
the US brought here was Lt. Gen. Reinhard Gehlen. He was head of the
“Wehrmacht Foreign Armies East” military intelligence service on the
eastern front during World War II. He was brought to Washington where he
helped create the CIA which used Gehlen’s “
ratline ”
of contacts inside eastern European areas controlled by the Soviet
Union. The US used these “assets” to internally destabilize the Soviet
Warsaw Pact Bloc. They were among the causes of Stalin’s deep internal
paranoia and ruthlessness. CIA director Allen Dulles, a long-time Nazi sympathizer, laughed about driving Stalin nuts.
After the CIA had downloaded Gehlen’s brain, they shipped him back to
Germany. He was put in charge of the CIA’s new partner, the West German
“Federal Intelligence Service.” So almost as soon as the war was over,
West Germany came under the control of the Washington Deep State. That
has made it difficult for Germany to be a sovereign nation ever since.
Vladimir Putin has a great friendship with Gerhard Schröder, the
German politician who served as Chancellor of Germany from 1998-2005.
Schröder has been a strong voice for ending the New Cold War hostility
toward Russia from the West.
Many business leaders in Germany speak openly about ending the
sanctions on Russia that have hurt the German economy badly.
Washington’s drive to “full spectrum dominance” expresses its desire to
control every level of every other nation’s affairs.
AG: Do you think that this difference, or much of
it, is about the natural gas pipeline from Russia to Germany, given that
the US fossil fuel industry would rather Germany buy its liquefied
natural gas (LNG) shipped across the Atlantic?
BG: That is no doubt a big factor in the current
drama. US fracking corporations want to ship LNG over to Europe at
higher prices than Russian gas can be transported via pipelines. Most
Europeans laugh at the thought. Following the US-directed coup in
Ukraine in 2014, and the installation of a right-wing/Nazi-backed
government, the US pressured Kiev to sign a deal to purchase US LNG
instead of gas from neighboring Russia. Ukraine’s economy is in collapse
as Western interests hollow it out. Even the rich topsoil in Ukraine,
once the breadbasket of the Soviet Union, is being sold to Western
corporate interests.
AG: Do you think Germans who’d rather Germany get
out of NATO anyway saw COVID-19 as an opportunity and played a
significant role in Germany’s withdrawal from DEFENDER Europe 20?
BG: In a poll in 2018, 42% of
Germans wanted the US troops out of
their country, while 37% wanted them to stay. In the same poll it was
reported that Germans felt more sympathy for Vladimir Putin, 36%, than
Trump, 6%, while 58% said they didn’t know or else didn’t answer. So
attitudes are changing and this pandemic will only accelerate that.
AG: Russia borders the European nations of Norway,
Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Belarus and Ukraine. It
looks like all these nations are NATO members except Finland, Belarus,
and Ukraine, and Finland plans to join in 2025. In
Belarus ,
there seems to be a tug-of-war far less reported than that in Ukraine,
with Belarus still identifying as a strategic ally of Russia. Could you
talk about the significance of the Belarusian buffer zone and the
Ukrainian proxy war?
BG: Belarus is key. Attacks on Russia have always
come through Ukraine and Belarus. The US has destroyed Ukraine and is
now working to draw Belarus into its hip pocket. Belarus is using the
current “love” from Washington to get more economic concessions from
Russia. The US would be thrilled to take control of Belarus. Look at
where it is on the map.
I have followed the coup in Ukraine since it began in 2014. In 2016 I went to
Odessa along
with Regis Tremblay and Phil Wilayto to stand with the mothers of those
who were killed by Nazi death squads in the Odessa Trade Union Hall
soon after the coup in Kiev. The only people ever sent to jail for those
assassinations were the victims’ relatives, but the new “democratic”
government and its henchmen were responsible, and they were both funded
and directed by the CIA.
The US is using Ukraine to demonize Moscow and destabilize the
Russian border while at the same time robbing it blind. Sadly, few in
the West clearly understand the
US-NATO destabilization plan all around Russia.
Anyone inside of Ukraine—particularly in the Donbass region right on
its Russian border—who dares stand up against the US puppet government
in Kiev or supports the breakaway republics in Lugansk and Donetsk is
called a Putin-lover. The
coup in Ukraine was
an Obama operation carried out by Vice President Joe Biden, Secretary
of State Hillary Clinton, and the State Department’s Victoria Nuland.
AG: Which of the NATO member nations have US/NATO bases and/or weapons installed on their Russian borders?
BG: Poland of course has a US base as does Norway,
and both have Russian borders. The US often holds war games in northern
Sweden, Norway, and Finland. Pentagon war games regularly go on in the
Baltics, creeping right up to the Russian borders in Latvia, Estonia and
Lithuania. How are the Russians to react?
The US has also installed missile launch bases in Romania and Poland
that could fire first-strike, nuclear-capable cruise missiles that would
reach Moscow in 10 minutes. The US is also building up its military
connections in Georgia to gain another strategic leverage point against
Russia. And there’s much more US/NATO military aggression aimed at
Russia than what I’ve just shared.
Fort Russ News is
a good website for tracking this.
US Army Special Forces from Ft.
Carson, Colorado, are rotated in and out of western Ukraine to a base
where they train Ukrainian soldiers. They are then sent off to eastern
Ukraine, along the border with Russia, to attack their
Russian-speaking fellow citizens in the Donbass region.
AG: Do you know how many nuclear weapons NATO has installed near Russia’s borders and where they are?
BG: The US/NATO have bases in five countries in
Europe that store about 150 airplane-delivered nuclear bombs (B61
warheads). Belgium, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, and Turkey each host
such facilities. At other US Navy and Air Force bases throughout Europe,
the Mediterranean, Middle East, and Asia-Pacific, the US has the
capacity to go nuclear in a flash with either Russia or China.
AG: And does Russia have equivalent force, including nuclear force, on their side of these borders?
BG: Yes, Russia can match the US in nukes and has
even gone farther in new technologies like hypersonic missiles. For
more than 10 years Russia and China have been warning Washington that
continued missile deployments along their borders—on land and on board
Navy Aegis destroyers—jeopardize all negotiations to eliminate nuclear
weapons.
Russia and China have both renounced first-strike use, and their
nuclear forces are for retaliatory purposes only. They have no scenarios
for a nuclear first strike on Europe or the US. The US refuses to renounce first-strike nuclear attacks. The Pentagon actually holds war games that include nuclear first-strikes on
Russia and China. The Space Command annually calls their first-strike
war game the “Red Team vs. the Blue Team.” Space technology already
enables and directs all US military operations, and now we’re told that
we need Trump’s Space Force. The goal is total domination of earth and
space on behalf of Western corporate capitalism.
Star Wars will be the most expensive industrial project in human
history. The aerospace industry has directed its Washington lobbyists to
identify “dedicated funding sources” that could be used to pay for it,
and they have: Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and the rest of the
social safety net that’s already in tatters.
AG: Are nuclear weapons on NATO’s Russian borders
any greater threat than nuclear weapons that could be launched from
Germany, from other European nations, or even from within the US or
Russia? I last read that it would take an ICBM launched in the US 30 to
35 minutes to reach Russia. Could you help us understand this?
BG: The closer a military has its weapons to their
declared “enemy” target, the quicker and easier it is to hit them. That
makes a decapitating first-strike more tempting to the US top brass. The
Pentagon has this capability in place all over the world with its 800
military bases.
All the nuclear nations can destroy one another with nukes many times
over. The ABM Treaty outlawed “missile defense” because this so-called
“shield” could be used after the first-strike “sword” is plunged into
another nation. “Missile defense” is a vital component of first-strike
planning. Getting rid of the ABM Treaty led to even worse
destabilization of the “balance of terror.”
George W. Bush walked away from the ABM treaty with Russia and
escalated funding for “missile defense.” Obama then began the ongoing
“missile defense” deployments encircling Russia and China. Russia
responded with hypersonic weapons that can get past the US “missile
defense” shield. It’s all an unfathomable waste of money and very
dangerous.
AG: DEFENDER Europe 20’s sweeping rehearsal for the
transfer of US troops to Europe seemed to assume the possibility of an
all-out shooting war between Russia and NATO, insane and infectious as
that sounds, coronavirus or no. Can you share any thoughts on that?
BG: Russia has been invaded over and over again in
its long history. Their military is oriented toward defending their vast
territory. Sweden has invaded Russia dozens of times. Napoleon and
Hitler both failed to take control of Russia in wars that cost
incredible numbers of lives.
More than 27 million Russians died defeating the Nazis in World War II. In contrast, the US lost only 500,000.
 |
Moscow museum panoramic painting of Nazi attack on Russia during WW II |
The West wants control of Russia’s vast resources and its land mass.
Now, with global warming and the melting of the Arctic ice, Western oil
interests want control of the region, but Russia happens to have the
largest border with the Arctic. The RAND Corporation produced a
study that
calls for balkanizing Russia, breaking it into smaller countries that
are easier to seize and control. It’s insane but that is what
Washington’s CIA-run foreign policy is all about.
This is the reason for the constant demonization of Putin and Russia.
Even many so-called progressives fall for it and become unwilling to
look at the larger geostrategic issues that drive the US’s ceaseless
efforts to take down Moscow.
Russia’s attitude is, “We don’t want war, but if you attack us, we
will hit you back with everything we’ve got.” Putin often asks, “What
kind of a world would it be without Russia?”
Westerners know little about Russia’s long history and culture.
Needless to say, their dismissive arrogance does not endear Russians to
us.
Russia cut their military budget during the last two years, moving
the money into social and infrastructure development, but at this point,
their new hypersonic missiles are more advanced than anything the US
has.
AG: OK, getting back to the coronavirus pandemic,
how do you see NATO and the US military operating if the pandemic lasts
just another three months, another six months, or even a year or more?
Some are saying that everything will be different and less globalized
when it’s over, the more so the longer it lasts. Is there any chance
that will include reducing global US troop deployment on 800+ military
bases?
Can the drone bombing continue with minimal deployment? Could the
expectation of future pandemics become a sick and twisted argument for
weapons in space?
BG: My mind is racing with theories about what is going on at present with the virus and global economic shutdown.
AG: You’re not the only one.
BG: Is the Deep State pulling these strings? Is
COVID-19 a bioweapon produced in either the US or China? And if not,
could it have leaked from a US or Chinese lab?
Is there a plan to
suspend the Constitution and
declare martial law ? Recent reports suggest so.
Will the US military be used to contain a hungry and angry populace here at home that at some point rebels, as in “
The Hunger Games ”?
Will the virus infest the US military to a point where they are all
under quarantine? Virtually anything is possible at this point.
The Deep State doesn’t give a damn about the young people who join the military primarily to get a job.
Here in Maine, just 10 miles from where I live, we have the Bath Iron
Works (BIW) Shipyard owned by General Dynamics, which employs 6,700
workers. The machinists union there fears the worst from the virus and
has asked that they all be allowed to go home on paid leave. The company
says they could go home unpaid or use up their vacation time. The
first positive test for
the virus surfaced at BIW on March 23, but the company is still
refusing to back down. Neither General Dynamics nor the Pentagon give a
damn about these workers.
So, like other nations with US bases, our local population feels
threatened by the local military production facility at BIW. Even the
workers who depend on it for their livelihood are afraid. People must
begin to reevaluate the utility of US bases and weapons manufacturers
and reflect deeply on their cost and their true mission.
We’ve been calling for the
conversion of BIW to
build commuter rail systems, offshore wind turbines, tidal power
systems and more to deal with our real problem: climate change. Studies
show that if we made such a conversion we’d also get more jobs as a
result.
The US military and economic empire is itself a deadly virus. It
sucks the wealth and life-blood out of its host nations, including the
US, but the world is waking up. Hopefully it won’t be too late.
~ Ann Garrison is an independent journalist based in the San Francisco Bay Area. In 2014, she received the Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza Democracy and Peace Prize for her reporting on conflict in the African Great Lakes region. She can be reached at ann@anngarrison.com.