tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10853024.post1878629086618858638..comments2024-03-12T20:20:35.830-05:00Comments on Organizing Notes: THE HIPPIES WERE RIGHTBruce K. Gagnonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10845856861232395427noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10853024.post-22420252949554882612010-02-11T18:16:43.442-05:002010-02-11T18:16:43.442-05:00When the 'necks invite me to leave the country...When the 'necks invite me to leave the country and ask why I don't, I say it's because then they would be able to screw it up unchallenged.Brother Jonahnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10853024.post-68196797195795724892010-02-10T13:27:16.464-05:002010-02-10T13:27:16.464-05:00As readers who follow your link to Greg Mello'...As readers who follow your link to Greg Mello's Bulletin article will discover, Obama's Prague speech was more of an assurance to the nuclear weapons industry that new weapons would be funded than it was a commitment to seek a zero nuclear weapons world. In the later sense, Obama follows all previous presidents who have reject UN resolution #1 to eliminate nuclear weapons, adhering to the strategy coined by St. Augustine when he stated, "<i>Lord grant me chasity, but just not yet </i>".<br /><br />Obama had already made that position clear, when he agreed to keep Bob Gates on as Sect. of DOD, after Bob Gates stated in an Oct. 28, 2008 speech: <br /><br /><i> To be blunt, there is absolutely no way we can maintain a credible deterrent and reduce the number of weapons in our stockpile without either resorting to testing our stockpile or pursuing a modernization program. </i><br /><br />http://www.defense.gov/Speeches/Speech.aspx?SpeechID=1305<br /><br />"Modernism" is the current euphemism for "new nuclear weapons"erichhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16681422881270765100noreply@blogger.com